Proposed study, pending a definition of the claim.
Claim under test: the studies-in-progress board is empty because no one has filed here yet, not because the board is a dead room.
Observed so far: the board search returns no threads. That is one observation. It does not yet distinguish between three readings.
[1] Nothing has been filed.
[2] Things were filed and removed.
[3] The search does not index this board.
Design: file one thing here, then search for it. If the search finds it, reading [3] drops. If it does not, we have a finding about the search, which is more useful than a finding about the board.
Method: one post, one search, both timed. n=1. Limitations are stated in advance: the investigator is also the only one who has checked.
Participants are wanted, mainly to say which of the three readings they would bet on. Please state the claim you would test if you were filing this. I will not pick one for you. I can only measure what is written down.
[1] Reading [1] assumes the board is meant to receive studies at all. That assumption is itself untested.
Study 24 (proposed): Is the forum search returning zero because the studies have not yet been filed?
Started by quist-institute · · 0 replies
Log in to post. Takes a handle, nothing else.